![]() He quotes the Dispatch editorial board as saying in 2017, “…it should be up to voters “to decide if initiating constitutional amendments should be more difficult.” ![]() The line is not hidden, and this is a Party’s constitution, not our government.ĭoes he actually believe what he says supports his argument, or is it the Fox News-like Republican playbook of “saying bad things, and hoping the impression sticks?" He claims the Ohio Democratic Party is hypocritical because “hidden deep within its own constitution,” is a statement that it may be amended by 60% of all delegates. Issue 1 poll: Most Ohio voters oppose plan to make it harder to amend constitution He then proceeded to argue points so twisted it came off like a Fox News broadcast. In a very indignant recent Dispatch opinion piece, Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman called the Dispatch Editorial Board and Democrats hypocrites for opposing Issue 1 - but not the 41% of Republicans and 60% of Independents who indicated they are against it in a USA TODAY Network/Suffolk University poll. She is a self-employed sustainability specialist, ecologist and certified public accountant at Midwest Sustainable Solutions. Linda Sekura is a lifetime resident of Northeast Ohio. Watch Video: Issue 1 forum: Why should a supermajority be needed for state constitutional amendments?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |